Donnerstag, 17. September 2015

DatingFactory acquired by Agile Wings

DatingFactory acquired by Agile Wings

Agile Wings is the new owner of DatingFactory - a while label dating site service provider.

The new owners are said to bring their technology resources, marketing knowledge and years of experience to improve and continue to grow the Dating Factory White Label platform.

Agile Wings promises a better performing product,  higher return on investment and long term growth...

So far the main problem with running dating sites on DatingFactory was: it was almost impossible to make any money with it: conversion to finally paying members was extremely low and advertising costs extremely high. Even without paying a big part as an affiliate fee to a dating site provider, it is a tough challenge to make money in the dating field with a subscription based model as costs-per click go up to several GBP / Euros / USD per click.Only a few "clicks" convert to registered members and of those a small fraction are willing to pay. A big part of those paying (most male) members on paid dating sites in general, often finds out there is actually almost no female members apart from spammers/scammers or fake profiles and want a refund which leads to expensive backcharges....

So even when you can keep 100% of the revenue only very few companies manage to reach the break-even or even make money. Imagine you pay 50% ot 70% comission? Almost impossible to make money as client of a white-label network.

Also thousands of webmasters never reach the minimum payout - so the whitelabel provider never has to pay the commission.

At least white-label providers will always profit - they generate new signups and members to their database and often never have to pay for those signups as webmasters never reach minium payout or as members never convert to paying members or only after a very long time - or lead to other people signing up who will convert to paying members which the system would never find out.

Tanya Fathers  will continue in the position of the company CEO and work on the further growth strategy for the business and Lisa Moskotova will continue as COO.

Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015

The best linking strategoy for multi-national dating site networks

What is the best linking strategy for multi-national dating websites?

Assuming you had to optimize the linking strategy of a dating sites network (same brand), what would be the best strategy?

First of all, you need to decide if you have one domain per country or whether you are going to use one subdomain for every country.

Secondly, do you want to use canonical tags or rather not?

Thirdly, which sites should be linked from which sites in order not to be treated as a link-farm by Google?

I would say, let's look at the top dating sites in the uk that are international and server individual sites per country. Linking Strategy(?) uses a .com domain for all country - with 2-letter country codes as subdomains for each country (maybe as they have not managed to get the trademark/domain in everywhere?)

In the Uniteds Kingdom, uses the subdomain

Strangely, they are setting a canonical tag to themselves on

<link rel="canonical" href="" /> 
There is NO link to however around 15 homepage links to the specific country subdomains.

Also the .com domain sets a useless canonical  to itself:

<link href="" rel="canonical" />

On the .com Domain, the only link to and uk.match com as well as the following page: 

which links to all existing(?) subdomains- however not directly - with redirects. Linking Strategy mainly uses but Google has indexed country specific subdomains such as Those subdomains however often redirect to country-specific domains such as or does not use any canonical tags.

 On the homepage, uses links to the country-specific tlds:
  1. <a class="footernav-link" href="">POF Brasil</a><br />
  2. <a class="footernav-link" href="">POF France</a><br />
  3. <a class="footernav-link" href="">POF Spain</a><br />
  4. <a class="footernav-link" href="">POF Germany</a> Linking Strategy uses tlds for every country the are offering their dating service.

On country-specific domains such as they link to other English tlds such as, or

eHarmony uses a canonical on the homepage that points to

<link rel="canonical" href="" />

eHarmonyalso links from the .com to their English-speaking tlds. The signup form shows a deeplink for the action that points to Linking Strategy uses subdomains for every country the are offering their dating service.

They are using (useless) canonnicals that point to themselves, e.g. on that show a self-referencing canonical:

<link rel="canonical" href="" />

On the homepage they link to all their networks - interestingly https. Most pay-sites are fully https while most free sites still use http in order not to cut their revenue from advertising.

On you see an error - they accidentally link to http:// instead of https:// - dough!

So, on the .com they link to ALL of their domains (even if the wrong protocol).

The canonical points to you can ignore it. Linking Strategy uses subdomains for every country the are offering their dating service.

the domain does not reference any other domains or subdomains while the subdomains links to all other subdomains:

<li class="us location_item"><a href="">United States</a></li><li class="ca location_item"><a href="">Canada</a></li><li class="au location_item"><a href="">Australia</a></li><li class="fr location_item"><a href="">France</a></li><li class="de location_item"><a href="">Germany</a></li><li class="it location_item"><a href="">Italy</a></li><li class="es location_item"><a href="">Spain</a></li><li class="se location_item"><a href="">Sweden</a></li><li class="in location_item"><a href="">India</a></li><li class="no location_item"><a href="">Norway</a></li><li class="br location_item"><a href="">Brazil</a></li></ul></div> does not seem to use canonical tags at all.

flirtbox Linking Strategy(?)

flirtbox uses country-specific top-level domains, e.g. or and no canonicals. Global cross-linking could not be detected.